Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (2024)

Today we're talking our first real look at Windows 11 performance with some Intel Core processors. There's a few reasons why we wanted to test using Intel's 10th and 11th gen CPUs first – of course, to see how much difference there is when compared to Windows 10 – but also to establish some baseline data that we can come back to in a few weeks with 12th-gen Alder Lake CPUs, which is meant to benefit from scheduling updates made with Windows 11.

As far as we're aware, Intel 10th and 11th-gen desktop CPUs should deliver comparable performance using either Windows 10 or Windows 11. But as always there seems to be conflicting reports, some claiming Windows 11 is much faster and others suggesting the opposite is true.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (1)

To find out what is what, we've tested over half a dozen configurations using the flagship Intel Core i9-11900K alongside an entry-level Core i3-10105F, which is a refreshed 10th gen part, featuring 4 cores with 8 threads. The idea is to see if there are any performance changes using either low-end or high-end hardware.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (2)

Now along with a fresh install of Windows 10 and Windows 11, we've also included a configuration based on a Windows 10 fresh install that was then upgraded to Windows 11. We should note that by fresh install we mean this is a recent install of Windows made on a brand new SSD, which is then loaded with all the applications we require for testing and diagnosing performance, so at that point we've installed as many (or more) applications and games than most of you will have installed at a given time.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (3)

TeamGroup was gracious enough to send over a pair of their 8TB MP34Q M.2 NVMe SSDs. These tiny SSDs offer 8TB of high speed storage and we've got one for the Windows 10 testing and another for Windows 11, which allowed us to go back and forth to double and in some instances triple check results.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (4)

The drives offer read throughput of up to 3.4 GB/s with writes as fast as 3 GB/s and we'll be including some storage test results towards the end of the article.

A word about VBS

The fourth configuration we've included is one with Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) enabled. By default, our Windows 11 install disabled this feature, but it's been reported that on some desktop and laptop PCs, VBS is enabled by default and can tank gaming performance by up to 25%.

It should be noted that VBS isn't a new feature and it's certainly not exclusive to Windows 11. You can enable it on Windows 10, but we've never come across a single configuration where it's enabled by default.

To check if VBS is enabled, use Windows search, type 'MSInfo32' and hit Enter. Towards the bottom of the system info you'll find if Virtualization-Based Security is enabled or not. To toggle it on/off, enter the Windows Security menu, navigate to the Device Security tab and under the header "Core isolation" you'll find the ability to toggle disable VBS.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (5)

We don't feel this is a feature most desktop users will need or want to enable, and this is especially true for gamers. But we've run a separate configuration with it enabled just so you can see the performance impact.

For those of you wondering, VBS is an enterprise-class feature designed to secure corporate PCs by creating an isolated and secure region of memory from the normal operating system. Windows can use this 'virtual secure mode' to host a number of security solutions, providing them with greatly increased protection from vulnerabilities in the OS, and preventing the use of malicious exploits which attempt to defeat protections.

Going into the benchmark phase, our test systems used the Core i9-11900K and Core i3-10105F, both of which were installed on the Asus ROG Strix Z590-E Gaming WiFi motherboard using BIOS version 1007. For the memory, we've gone with a Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 CL16 kit, and for the graphics card the MSI RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (6)

As for the testing itself we're going to look at application, gaming, storage and load time performance. All results are based on a 3 run average and in some instances we powered down the entire system between runs to avoid cached results. Okay let's get into the results.

Cache and Memory Latency Performance

Before we jump into the application benchmarks here's a quick look at cache and memory latency performance. In short we see no change, or virtually no change in L1, L2 or L3 cache performance with the Intel processors. Where we do see a notable performance difference is when looking at DRAM latency...

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (7)

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (8)

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (9)

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (10)

For the 10105F, the Windows 10 and Windows 11 installs deliver the same results, but enabling VBS does incur a 7% performance penalty and this will be noticed in memory-sensitive scenarios, such as gaming.

With the more powerful 11900K, we see that Windows 10 delivered the best results as the upgrade to Windows 11 increased latency by 5%, though a fresh Windows 11 install only increased latency by 3%. However, we're again seeing a noteworthy increase with VBS enabled, this time a 9% increase is seen when compared to the Windows 10 configuration.

Application Benchmarks

Moving on to Cinebench R23, we find that the 11900K produced its best result with Windows 10 though the difference is minimal, about a 1% increase over the fresh Windows 11 install. Enabling VBS had a very minor impact on performance at 2%, with the variation between the slowest and fastest configurations, and the same is also true for the Core i3 system.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (11)

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (12)

The Blender Open Data is very similar to what was seen with Cinebench. The Windows 10 and Windows 11 results are essentially identical, but enabling VBS comes with a slight performance penalty, this time around 3% when compared to what we saw when using Windows 10.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (13)

Moving on to the 7-Zip File Manager results we see that for the most part the Core i3 processor is able to deliver the same level of performance using Windows 10 or 11, with the VBS enabled Windows 11 configuration being the only exception as performance dropped 3%.

The margins were slightly larger with the 11900K and we found that Windows 10 provided the best results. Upgrading the Windows 10 install to Windows 11 reduced performance by 3% and a fresh install restored some of that. Then when comparing the fresh Windows 11 install with VBS enabled we again saw a 3% performance hit.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (14)

Testing with Adobe Photoshop 2021 shows similar performance for all four tested configurations when using the Core i3 processor and enabling VBS resulted in a 3% performance hit.

That said, we saw a far more significant 7% performance drop with the 11900K when using VBS. However, when comparing the fresh Windows 10 and 11 installs performance was much the same.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (15)

Both the Core i3 and Core i9 parts delivered the same performance using either Windows 10 or 11 in the Adobe After Effects benchmark, though this time we see a significant 10% performance drop with VBS enabled.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (16)

The last application benchmark is based on Adobe Premiere Pro and we're looking at virtually identical performance using Windows 10 or 11. The only exception is the VBS enabled config as this reduces performance by 12-13%.

Gaming Benchmarks

Time for a few game benchmarks. Please note we're not testing dozens upon dozens of games, rather you get the idea with just a few, so we're going to show the results for four titles, starting with F1 2021.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (17)

Using the Core i9-11900K we see that the fresh installs of Windows 10 and 11 delivered the same performance. Updating the Windows 10 install to 11 wasn't as fast, but we're talking extremely small margins of difference here.

Those margins were slightly increased with the Core i3 part, and Windows 10 did offer the best result by just 3%.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (18)

Rainbow Six Siege results are interesting as VBS reduced frame rates by 11-12%, though that margin is likely exaggerated due to the extremely high frame rates. Those results aside we see identical performance from Windows 10 and Windows 11 using either CPU.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (19)

Enabling VBS reduced performance in Watch Dogs: Legion by up to 8%, seen when looking at the 1% low figures. That aside, the fresh Windows 10 and 11 installs delivered the same results while there was a very small performance hit when simply upgrading 10 to 11.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (20)

The last game we tested was Cyberpunk 2077 and here we're looking at a ~8% performance hit with VBS installed. Other than that, performance is the same when comparing Windows 10 and 11.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (21)

Here's a look at Cyberpunk 2077 level load times using the TeamGroup 8TB NVMe SSD and here we're looking at no more than a 1 second difference between the various configurations, so Windows 11 won't speed up load times of today's games.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (22)

Interestingly, Windows 11 was also slower to load when compared to Windows 10, though the margin when running the 11900K is insignificant. Where the difference was somewhat more significant was with the Core i3 processor as Windows 11 took almost 40% longer to load, though that's a mere 3 second change. Still for our configuration Windows 11 didn't improve boot times.

Storage Performance

Before wrapping up testing, here's a look at storage performance with CrystalDiskMark. Read and write sequential performance is the same regardless of the configuration, so nothing to report here. However, the random queue depth 32 results are interesting.

Windows 11 is offering a massive increase in write performance over Windows 10. To be entirely honest, I'm no longer familiar with SSD testing and I haven't run CrystalDiskMark in years, but I can tell you after multiple system resets the results were repeatable and I did completely fill the brand new SSD before I began testing.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (23)

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (24)

So I believe the 20-26% performance increase we're seeing here with the 11900K is accurate, I'm just not sure why we're seeing such a substantial performance improvement. There was even a 10% uplift from Windows 10 to 11 with the Core i3 processor despite the results being much lower overall.

Another interesting point to note is that VBS cripples storage throughput, lowering both read and write performance. With the 11900K we're looking at a 21% drop for read throughput and a massive 58% drop in write throughput, or another way of putting it, Windows 11's random write performance was almost 2.5x faster with VBS disabled.

What We Learned

There you have it. For the most part there is little to no difference between Windows 11 and Windows 10 using Intel 10th and 11th-gen Core series processors across gaming, application, and storage performance. If you've experienced a notable drop in performance since upgrading, it's well worth checking to see if VBS is enabled and do something about that as we explained in the intro.

It's also worth noting that for maximum performance you're better off starting over with a fresh install of Windows 11. Besides the small performance loss that was seen with the upgraded install, we also on occasion randomly suffered blue screen crashes when loading Windows 11, something that never happened with the fresh install.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (25)

As always, the upgrade procedure is more convenient and we have systems that are running fine this way, but if you're suffering from stability issues after upgrading, there's a good chance that process is the source of your troubles.

In a nutshell, Windows 11 offers no real performance advantage over Windows 10 with perhaps the only exception being random read/write storage performance, but we won't know if this was limited to our test configuration or not until we conduct further testing. On that note, we're keen to see what Windows 11 does for Intel's upcoming Alder Lake CPUs, as well as a look at Ryzen which recently received a patch that addresses L3 cache performance issues.

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (26)

On that note, we'll be primarily testing Alder Lake using Windows 11 for our day-one review while sticking with the Windows 10 data we have for all older platforms, including Ryzen. We've just found that won't place the 10th and 11th-gen Core series processors at a disadvantage, so with that we're going to wrap this one up and move on to testing some upcoming Intel CPUs for an upcoming review very soon.

If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing.Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our workOur promise: All reader contributions will go toward funding more contentThat means: More tech features, more benchmarks and analysis
Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test (2024)


Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 Performance Test? ›

Windows 11 performed better in terms of download speed, but worse in terms of upload speed compared to Windows 10. Windows 11 outperforms Windows 10 in Cinebench, Superposition, and multi-core benchmarks, with a 30-point difference in Cinebench and a 69-point difference in Superposition.

Is Windows 10 or 11 better for performance? ›

Both operating systems have similar security features, update processes, and compatibility with hardware and software. However, Windows 11 offers improved performance and features compared to Windows 10, making it a better choice for those looking for a more modern and efficient operating system.

Is Windows 11 performance slower than Windows 10? ›

Will Windows 11 Slow Down My PC? Windows 11 is faster than Windows 10. However, some users is experiencing slow performance issue due to low disk storage or outdated drivers.

Is Windows 11 better or worse performance? ›

Tech-speak translated: Windows 11 can get better performance out of many modern Intel CPUs, and you'll see worse performance if you downgrade to Windows 10. Most people are better off just sticking with Windows 11 on a PC that comes with it.

Does Windows 11 still have performance issues? ›

Windows 11 can encounter numerous slowdowns and performance issues, and most of these respond well to a variety of system checkups and cleanups.

What are the disadvantages of Windows 11? ›

Windows 11 has advantages, such as an improved user interface, better performance, enhanced security, and improved gaming experience, but it also has several disadvantages, such as limited compatibility with older software, fewer customization options, and limited virtual desktop support.

Does Windows 11 use more RAM? ›

The answer is yes! Windows 11 includes many new features that require more RAM, overall it uses slightly more RAM than Windows 10.

Will Windows 11 make my computer faster or slower? ›

Windows 11 does a lot under the hood to speed up a PC's performance. The same PC will generally run faster on Windows 11 than Windows 10.

Is it worth upgrading to Windows 11? ›

Not only is Windows 11 considered faster and snappier than Windows 10, it also comes with many new features improving performance, user-friendliness, device compatibility (runs Android apps), and even gaming. It does come with some interface changes which might take some getting used to and also requires a recent CPU.

Why is Windows 11 so much slower? ›

If your Windows 11 computer lags and runs slowly, you're probably straining it beyond its capabilities. Several factors contribute to this, including unnecessary background processes, automatic updates, non-essential third-party services, misconfigured notifications, and privacy settings.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 6598

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.